Statement:

"Simulev suffers from a rather severe case of islamophobia, as amply documented before."
- Carl Bildt.

Just for the record, while Mr. Bildt flatters me, it should now be obvious for everyone to watch that Mr. Bildt in turn suffers from denial of reality regarding Islamofacism (see, for one example http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/), a probable common dysfunction amongst high politicians, and apologist excusers for Mohammedan terrorism, who's silence are speaking volumes.
So while it has been revealing, and I am grateful for getting to know his thoughts, I cannot help wondering when he will run for the Social democratic party or the other leftist, since he clearly are closer to their politics, than his former conservatory colleagues.

Let me just finish this subject, by quoting another highly international regarded Swedish politician, Mr Per Ahlmark, from his book; “It’s the democracy, stupid!”

“Today we see the beginning of a blind follower-wave that wishes to hollow out the resistance against the totalitarian Islamism.
[...]
Conclusive is if a human, a country, a government or a paper has the ability to feel the concern to obvious threats, and thereafter reach the conclusion; raise resistance!”
[my translation, my emphasis]

Mr Carl Bildt does obviously not belong to that later category. Case closed.

More talks with Bildt....

Good News! The former Primeminister spellt my handle correct this time...

"Let me just calmly point out to the person hiding - I understand why - under the pseudonym Simulev – “
Let me just as calmly retort and say I sincerely doubt it. Unless Carl Bildt has converted to Judaism. If he himself, along with his family was the mark for upcoming extermination. Then maybe he would understand the last 2000 years of constant persecutions and pogroms against the Jewsih people that has lasted until this very day. Perhaps then he could get a glimpse of what a Holocaust followed up by ongoing terror might produce. The Shylock Jew is dead, he was gassed in death factory’s by European butchers 60 years ago, the few remaining survivors has reminders of the nightmare tattooed in their underarms for ever. Their grandchildren are redeemed by the memories. Today we call that Israel Defence Forces, perhaps one of the finest and most effective army on earth.

This is needed because of today gruesome hate-Jews-speech is preached allover Middle East, and in the new immigrant, under the pretext refuge and asylum, enclaves in Europe that preaches incitement and hatred where it is proclaimed a blessing to become a martyr in Allah’s name, if killing the infidel. Mass murder instructions that echoed in Swedish mosques only the last year. Daily death treats and terror instructions in Swedish operated Internet servers.

”that he not only is he advocating a policy of collective punishment but that he also advocates genocide as that particular punishment.”
I most certainly have not. Let me draw a simple mind-map for you: If state A attacks state B, I say that state B, the one that is attacked, has the right to defend herself. Until that threat cease to exist. Are you saying that you disagree with that?

”It's certainly true that Israels have died of terrorist attacks during the intifada. It is also true that Palestinians have died. Over 1 000 in the first case and over 4 000 in the later case.”
And it’s equally true that no-one should have died, if the EU pet Arafat had accepted normal decent negotiations, instead of unlashing his terror brigades against Israelis civilians as answer if he wanted a new 23:rd Arab state.
If Muslim Arabs lay down their arms there can be peace. If Israel lays downs it arms they will be destroyed, as the Muslim Arabs has promised time after time. Not a single Muslim Arab will be shoot by any Israeli, if the Muslim Arabs not are firing first, forcing Israelis to return fire.

”I honestly ask the person behind Simulev to reconsider and retract.”
If you can explain to me why I should accept terror-rewards, slicing Jewish mainland’s, and give to people that preaches that not only I shall die, but my entire family along with all relatives? Convince me please, I urge you.

Warning Signals

Why the continuation of the charade? Those who state:
“Both Abu Mazen In Palestine” [sic]

Are still insisting of using the nom de guerre [war name] of Mazen. They are actually advocating that, by their own repetitive usage of the well known terrorism code lingo words, clearing the path of endorsing leftist inspired “revolution” [terrorism] against Israel. And now they also claim the fairy tale of Palestine now actually exists.

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism.
"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa. While as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."
-PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein, March 31, 1977, interview with the Dutch newspaper Trouw.

If those, as free individuals living in a free democratic society, where elementary facts are known and presented, or easily for anyone findings, and can be checked, but they for some very strange reason, by own choice, freely chooses to come to any other opposite conclusions, for example stating that Palestine and "Palestinians" exists, or at least should so do, as a huge terror reward? Then I have no other choice, but to address such current and previous displayed arrogant history ignorance, with the same words as the freelance author Rachel Neuwirth aimed in "Self-Proclaimed "Expert" Distorts History And Take Us All For Fools" at the NY Times writer Thomas Friedman with harsh judgments:

“You stand accused of waging your very own intifada against the Children of Israel, and for that there is no excuse. You are nothing more than a full-blown apologist for Arab terrorism. You have spent ample time in the Middle East but it has taught you nothing.”

Regretfully
Simulev

continued talks

Between the Arabs and Israelis? Yes that too. But I am thinking of my own latest exchange with the former Swedish Primeminister. In a subject he dubbed as "Hebron Horror", I would however rather call it showing colors. (Red color is Bildt comments, Blue colors are my comments -sorry about that, no pun intended i guess). Perhaps an example of political diplomacy peace talks?

Mr Bildt.

“You not only deny the Muslims the Prophet Abraham - I guess you deny him to the Christians as well”
I most certainly do not. Please explain to me how the Jewish patriarch Abraham could be a Muslim some two thousand years before Islam existed?

“- but also want to deny them the state that now has the support of the United Nations, the European Union, the United States, Russia as well as the new government of the state of Israel.”
While I am grateful for your answers, I am however more interested in your personal answers regarding your own politics, than seeing you pointing towards other political leaders, and their various agendas.
Meanwhile, time for a small history revaluation for those who might suffer from amnesia.
Just prior to World War II, the leaders of our world gathered to speak about “the issue” of Czechoslovakia. Stalin representing Communist Russia, Hitler representing national socialistic Germany and Neville Chamberlain representing the colonial rule Britannia. They agreed, that the Czechoslovakian sudet-land somehow belonged to Germany, over the head of the democracy of Czechoslovakia. A happy Chamberlain returned to his British parliament proudly declaring the now infamous line “I believe there is Peace in our time”. Adolph Hitler a couple of months later proved that the land he just had tricked the world, to gain without firing a bullet, the natural mountain defense lines of the sudet-land, and it was the first stage of raping Europe in blazing flames.
Now, in your opinion, was that decision rightfully just because outside political leaders could and overruled the democracy of Czechoslovakia? If not, why does the world suggest a very similar repetition now aimed at the only Jewish democracy?

“I get sorry when I see the hatred coming out of you.[...]
I'm only reassured by my knowledge that your extreme views are considered extreme and unrepresentative in Israel as well."
Really? It’s not that you are trying to dismiss me (and common logics) with judgmental harsh words? Meanwhile, let these words, written already in 1996, echo:

‘The Arab campaign to keep all of West Bank free of Jews, like the campaign of the 1930s to keep Palestine free of Jews, may have garnered international support, but this is based, now as then, not on justice but on injustice. Thus the Jewish state, which was squeezed by violations of international promises and by Arab conquest to an indefensible coast, that saw Jews forcibly expelled from the ancient Jewish cities they had come to rebuild, that was attacked by Arab forces from the surrounding mountains, is now being told by virtually the entire world that it must accept a confined and stifling existence on the narrow shoreline dominated by a hostile ”Judenrein” Palestinian state on these same mountains, the very heart of the Jewish home. If Lord Cecil had proclaimed “Judea for the Jews. Arabia for the Arabs” the world was now saying “Arabia for the Arabs –And Judea too”. The reversal of casualties was now complete.
[…]
‘For the PLO is an Pan-Arab Trojan horse, a gift that the Arabs has been trying to coax the West into accepting for over twenty years, so that the West in turn can force Israel to let in the gates. The Arabs paint their gift up prettily with legitimacy, with the pathos of its plight, with expressions of love for the cherished ideas of freedom, justice and peace. Yet no matter how its dressed up to conceal the fact, the ultimate aim of this gift remains; to be allowed within Israel’s defensive wall, to be parked on the hills overlooking Tel-Aviv, whence it can perform its grisly task. Every inch of western acceptance –the cover stories, the banquets, the observer status, the embassies, and any territory the PLO has ever been able to get their hands on –it uses to push it ever closer to its goal. And while it is difficult for uninitiated Westerners to imagine the Arabs destroying Israel as the Greeks laid waste to Troy, it all to easy for anyone familiar with Israel’s terrain to imagine, precisely as Arafat has promised, that a PLO state implanted ten miles from the beaches of Tel Aviv would be a mortal danger to the Jewish state.’

Know who wrote that? Yes that’s right, it’s your colleague Mr Benjamin Netanyahu in his self-explanatory book I previously just had recommended for you. The anti-terrorist expert and formerly elite soldier who also are the former Prime Minister of Israel and top head within Israel’s democratic ruling party Likud. I believe he could be regarded as representative for some Israelis?

Sincerely
Simulev

Bildt blogs

Who is Carl Bildt? He is perhaps most famous for being the Swedish conservative parties former leader, and a previous Swedish right wing oriented Prime Minister. A Swedish politician on the highest level in other words, who for the last decade has been working with interest in international politics, and who recently started his own blog (kudos to Alicio). Last two day's I have been interacting with him on his blog, And it started like this -with a brief history reminder....

Dear Carl Bildt...

"If it was only for the protection of Israel it should have followed the pre-1967 border."
[Previously stated by Mr.Bildt in answer to Alicio]

First a quick question: Do you wish to reward islamofacism and Arabist terrorism, along with history forgery? But before I start, perhaps a little history 101 reminder? The 1967 line is a temporary cease fire line. As you may (or may not) recall, it came about first after the Arab aggression -that had the outspoken intent of, not defeating, but open destruction of the Jewish democracy (drench the Jews in sea, color it red with their blood, the Arabic leadership promised, etcetera). Now if you consult any international lawyer they will tell you that such aggression is illegal according to international law and any sovereign state has a legal right to defend herself. Hence all Israel self-defense actions was perfectly legal as the previous Arabic aggression was illegal. A natural consequence of the illegal Arab aggression is Israelis liberation and control of the disputed areas. The previous 19 years the Arab had also illegally occupied the disputed areas after the same kind of Illegal Arabic war aggression 1948. Therefore these areas have never belonged to any Arab leadership legally. It seems that you just suggested that Israel should forget about the Arabic aggression war by rewarding and concrete cease fire lines as recognized international borders? Jordan has no whatsoever claim for these areas, and any “Palestinian” state never existed.

3 times has Israel contributed in the trials and errors of creating a “Palestinian state” for the first time in history ever.
1948, Arabs rejected that idea and instead choose war.
While Arabs thereafter illegally occupied the disputed areas (and a heavy influx of Muslim Arabs in ethnical cleansing under the newly created Arab imposed apartheid-rule which also made Judea judenrein) for two decades while looting and stealing previous Jewish property, not a sound was made from the Arabs of the creation for a “Palestinian state”, PLO was formed 1964 when the disputed areas still was under Arabic military control, they however at the time stated that their goal was not to create any fictional Palestine, but instead to destroy Israel.
1967, Israel tried to hand back their legal spoils of war Judea/Samaria in the previous Arab aggression, only to be meet by the infamous three no’s from the Arabs summit at Khartoum:
No to peace with Israel,
No to negotiations with Israel,
No to recognition to Israel (existence rights).
2000 The Arabic leader Arafat flat out rejected the Israeli offer of such a state and including the unimaginable of dividing Israel’s eternal capital Jerusalem’s eastern parts. Arafats answer was no counter offer, nothing. Except the invoked and planned Muslim Arab holy war in a terrorwave that rained all over Israelis civilian society much to the decade old promises of Arafat’s own party and plans from the 1974 “two phase plan”.

So far these are, factual and undisputed historic events, that cannot be altered. It happened, as you as a enlighten political leader probably are very aware off. So after this brief history reminder, I hope you’ll excuse me of taking myself the liberty of getting personal, I wonder what it is that drives you in these questions? Justice? Peace? Going down in the history books as a peace broker?

Now, one could easily argue that it may be a bit strange or perhaps even insane, to turn down in the last 60 years what one claims (I.e the Muslim Arabs) to be ones wishes, a own state, three times in a row? So far Israel clearly has the legal, moral, historical claims over the disputed areas, when compared with the recent modern invention and propaganda theft of the so-called “Palestinians”.
But let’s go a bit further back. Jordan, as you know is about 4 times larger than current Israel. That’s a geographical undisputed fact as well. What now is Jordan, was called the Palestine mandate 1920. That year no one had ever heard about the later invention of Jordan. Around this time the San Remo conference, the only international legal document (at that time from former UN) stipulated that these areas were suppose to become the Jewish homland, as the rest of the Middle East was given to the Arabs. The colonial Brittish mandate rulers broke this agreement two years later and ceded of and handed away four fifths to an Saudi Arabic tribe in blackmail payoff trying to avoid war with French controlled Syria. This means that in fact Muslim Arabs already control 4/5 of the previous mandate. Seventy eight (78) percentage to be more exact. What is left of the original Palestinian mandate on the Israeli side is the tiny coast line sliver constituting some twenty-two (22) percentage of the original full mandate areas. It’s that land the world now eagerly wishes to once again to divide, regardless that the Arabs so far has rejected all historical attempt to so do, and instead chosen war and gruesome terror for their path.
But so if one want to end the “occupation”, why are not the “Palestinians” attacking Jordan, that with the same arguments, that clearly stole the largest chunk of their so-called home land? Could it be because they care more of killing Jews than getting a 23;rd land of their own? Jordan, who’s current queen proudly proclaim herself as a Palestinian queen?

That there already exist 22 Arabic states, which none even with the best intentions cannot be claimed to even resemble of any democracy. In fact they are all either theocratic regimes or Baath fascist or dictator ruled states. None of them respect any human rights. And all evidence regarding the now suggested and superimposed 23;rd one points at the same direction, on a direct crash course against all basic human rights. A warped society where young children are being brainwashed into becoming the monsters of human walking bombs, and even their own minor girls get’s butchered in open streets if any suspicions that the “family honor” might have been in jeopardy. I.e if the girls wishes a sexuality individual free life and being sold by forcible cousin arranged slave marriages with minors.

Now, this may come as a shocker, but when you are trying to compare Israeli "fundamentalist" such small minorities that can be found in the general population, their parties are outlawed and combated by the Israeli government, while on the Arab side they form a overwhelming majority in poll after poll. While 20 percentage of the Israel citizens still consist of Muslim Arabs, no one of those seems to have any wishes to leave the Jewish state for a variety of choices of plain Muslim Arabic ruled states, how come? Meanwhile one can count at least teen different peace parties on the Israeli side, while zero on the opposite Arab Muslim side. Instead one finds the Arab groups on the EU and US terror list by the numbers. So are you trying to compare apples and oranges? Dividement of guilt, or just plain guilt by association? What is the perspective?
If, say for instance, the Sami people would feel unjust treated and their land stolen by the Swedish government, and they replied towards any peaceful negotiations with targeting civilian downtown buses in bombings and sharp shooting sniper attacks onto kindergarten children, would your first instinct as a state leader be to speak about handing away north of Sweden?

Please do not insult me with political mumbo-jumbo excuses like “complex situation” since I admit of viewing this matter in perfectly black and white, or do you also judge the Nazi regime goals in their self-proclaimed wars as “difficult”? And speaking of that, just as I see no good Nazi vs Evil Nazi, I don’t see good vs bad Arabic Muslim terrorist difference. And as long Fatah, the heritage of Arafats own party smack center of PLO and PA, has encoded in their constitution the destruction of Jewish state as main goal, there is no difference between their goal and the goal of the third Reich madmen Adolph Hitler. Or do you have an explanation why I should not believe the Muslim Arabs own promises of Jewish annihilation, when they daily preach exactly for that in Arabic in their schools, media and mosques?

When it comes to Judea and Samaria, Jewish blood has been paid in full of defending the Israeli existence rights from the Arab-Muslim ongoing terrorism and full out illegal aggression wars.

So I ask you again. Does Jew hating terrorist on holy war annihilation attempts towards Middle East's only democracy deserve to get a huge reward with ancient since time immoral Israeli Jewish land? Why? What kind of signals does that in your mind send to other terrorist’s organizations around the globe?

These, and more questions and how that went along, anyone can continue and read here of how these questions were answered (and not). However, the former conservative leader for some reason likes the Israeli infamous leftist paper Ha'aretz, which he also actually promotes, read our discussions here about that phenomena.